The Natural Evolution of New Thought and Science of Mind
From Personal Empowerment to Collective Liberation
For over a century, the New Thought movement and its many branches, including Science of Mind, have been rooted in a radical idea: that consciousness creates reality. That individuals, by aligning with Universal Mind, could heal, prosper, and live fulfilled lives. The early pioneers laid a foundation that honored personal empowerment, mental healing, and spiritual awakening. Yet, as the world has shifted, so too must New Thought evolve. We find ourselves now at a necessary and overdue turning point: recognizing that the principles which liberate individuals must also be applied to liberate communities, systems, and societies.
New Thought was never meant to be static. It was born as a response to religious dogma and societal rigidity. It emerged from a demand for spiritual freedom. Today, that same impulse demands that we expand our focus beyond personal prosperity to collective well-being. In this way, New Thought naturally intersects with Liberation Theology — a movement grounded in the idea that spiritual truth demands social action. This is not a departure from our principles. It is their fullest expression.
The Roots: Personal Empowerment as Sacred Work
The 19th and early 20th centuries were a time of profound spiritual experimentation. Figures like Phineas Quimby, Emma Curtis Hopkins, Ernest Holmes, and others articulated a vision of spiritual truth that centered the individual. The "mental cure" movement was a breath of fresh air for a society choking on guilt-based theologies and rigid Calvinism. New Thought taught that sickness, poverty, and failure were not divine punishments but misalignments of thought and belief.
In a society where many were denied personal agency — whether by class, race, or gender — the idea that every individual could access Divine Power directly was revolutionary. It still is. But it came with a shadow: an overemphasis on individualism, a tendency to overlook the ways systemic injustice constrains personal experience. Healing your thoughts was powerful; yet no amount of positive thinking alone could erase racism, poverty, or structural violence.
New Thought laid the groundwork for a new spiritual paradigm, but it was incomplete. It handed us the tools of consciousness without yet confronting the structures that deform consciousness in the first place.
The Science of Mind: Expanding the Frame
Ernest Holmes’ "The Science of Mind" built on these foundations. Holmes offered a synthesis of philosophy, science, and spirituality that emphasized mental healing, spiritual laws, and the creative process of thought. He was less concerned with dogma and more interested in principles that could be tested and verified by experience. For Holmes, God was not a person but a Principle, an infinite Intelligence present everywhere.
Holmes' work leaned heavily on the individual's relationship to the Universal Mind. Yet even Holmes, toward the end of his life, began to sense the need for collective engagement. In his later lectures, Holmes often spoke about the importance of community and collective action, urging his followers to engage in social issues and work towards a more equitable society. I see this as an emphasis on "a world that works for everyone" — not just a life that works for the self.
That seed — a world that works for everyone — was planted. But it has taken decades for it to fully germinate in the wider New Thought consciousness.
The Awakening: Recognizing Collective Reality
The world we inhabit today is radically different from the one Holmes and his contemporaries knew. Systemic inequality, racial injustice, climate crisis, and mass dislocation are no longer hidden realities. They are front-page news, daily lived experiences, existential threats.
It has become impossible for any authentic spiritual path to ignore them. The old spiritual bypass — that pain is just "false belief," that oppression can be "thought away" — rings hollow and cruel.
Consciousness is still primary. Belief still shapes experience. But now we see more clearly that beliefs are also social. That the collective consciousness of a society molds its laws, its economies, its hierarchies. Liberation must therefore be both personal and structural.
New Thought principles demand that we see the bigger field: that the healing of the world requires more than private visualization. It requires engaged, embodied action.
The Intersection: New Thought Meets Liberation Theology
Liberation Theology emerged from Latin America in the 20th century as a bold claim: God stands with the oppressed. Faith must be lived out in the struggle for justice. Theology must be not only reflective but revolutionary.
At first glance, Liberation Theology and New Thought might seem worlds apart. One emphasizes social struggle; the other emphasizes mental law. One speaks of God as an advocate for the poor; the other speaks of Universal Mind as impersonal Law.
But under the surface, they share a profound truth: that Spirit is active. That faith must be embodied. That true spirituality transforms both the inner and outer worlds.
Where New Thought can deepen Liberation Theology is in affirming the infinite creative capacity of every individual. Where Liberation Theology can deepen New Thought is in affirming that spiritual practice must confront systems, not just symptoms.
Together, they offer a complete vision: consciousness and action, prayer and protest, inner healing and outer justice.
The Imperative: From Individual Prosperity to Collective Liberation
It is time for New Thought to embrace the full arc of its principles. If we affirm that we are all expressions of One Mind, then we must affirm that injustice against one is a wound in the collective body. If we teach that abundance is a divine birthright, we must also work to dismantle the systems that hoard wealth and opportunity.
If we affirm that thought creates reality, then we must train our minds not just for personal gain but for collective transformation. This is not about abandoning our original teachings. It is about maturing them.
Prosperity is not private property. It is shared thriving. Healing is not just personal wholeness; it is communal restoration. Spiritual mind treatment must extend beyond the individual prayer chair into the voting booth, the protest line, the community meeting.
New Thought, at its best, has always been pragmatic. It has never demanded blind faith. It has demanded practice, discipline, and lived results. The same is true now. Liberation is not a slogan. It is spiritual work.
The Practice: What This Looks Like Now
So what does a New Thought-informed liberation theology look like in practice?
Expanded Vision: Teach that spiritual principle demands social principle. That as we heal ourselves, we must also heal our systems.
Embodied Prayer: Practice prayer not just for personal needs, but for collective healing — for racial justice, environmental restoration, economic fairness.
Community Building: Create spiritual communities that reflect the diversity of humanity and actively work against exclusion and hierarchy.
Sacred Activism: Encourage engagement in social movements, not from anger but from spiritual clarity. Marching, voting, organizing as spiritual practices.
Healing Historical Wounds: Acknowledge that history has shaped consciousness, and commit to truth-telling, reparative justice, and collective healing.
Universal Compassion: Move beyond "me and mine" to "we and ours."
This is not "politicizing" spirituality. It is fulfilling its promise.
The Call: A New Thought for a New World
The world is crying out for a spirituality that is both deep and active, mystical and just. New Thought has the DNA for this evolution. It is in our bones. It is in our founding impulse.
We are not here to cling to old forms. We are here to live out eternal principles in ever-new ways.
Consciousness evolves. Spirit reveals itself ever more fully. The Science of Mind is not a closed book; it is a living path. Liberation Theology is not a foreign import; it is the natural flowering of our own highest teachings.
As we step into this new chapter, we honor the past by transcending it. We take the tools of mental science and apply them not just to the self but to the world.
We move from "I" to "We." From "my good" to "our good." From "healing me" to "healing us."
This is New Thought's next great frontier. And we are already crossing it.
Thanks Robert. The sign of an enlightened idea is it expands the individuals thinking. This article does that for me. It leads me to consider just how constricting the Democratic and Republican ideologies are. I no longer wish to identify as conservative or liberal, for the ideas encased in the political schema feel hard and impenetrable.
The old adage evolve or die comes to mind. New thought principles, consciousness, must and always will outgrow its form. The creative process must re-create out of Itself…
Do we really want a world that works for everyone, or is this high vision just ‘a world that works for me’, pretentiously using pretty language to make us feel better about obtaining our own personal good?
This is beautiful! And as a 30 year student and teacher of the science of mind, I feel no controversy here… Thank you, Rev. Robert for articulating the evolution of our teaching.
“Spirit is active” 🙏🎉